My questions about Rabbi Silver's PROTECT Democracy proposal

 

Rabbi Silver,

I learned of your call to action at the Palm Beach Quaker meeting. I am the sole individual opposing the Palm Beach Quakers joining PROTECT democracy. Of course, nothing is stopping individuals in Palm Beach Quakers from joining PROTECT democracy individually. But my concerns and questions in response to your call to action is below. 

You wrote “an entire political party supports insurrection and threatens the liberty and natural beauty that we cherish in America.”

  • what political party are you talking about?
  • what specific ways does this party support insurrection?
  • what liberty and natural beauty is threatened?

You wrote “In Florida, Governor DeSantis seeks to impose a right wing, Christian theocracy
upon the rest of us”

  • what makes you think that he seeks to impose a right wing, Christian theocracy?

You wrote “They seek to replace democracy with
demagoguery”

  • what specific comments or legal/political action supports your viewpoint?
  • who is ‘they’? You are aware that you can refer to Governor DeSantis as ‘he’? I’m guessing that ‘they’ is the ‘an entire political party’ that you refer to above

You wrote “They seek to replace … education with indoctrination”

  • what specific comments or legal/political action supports this viewpoint of yours?

You wrote “They seek to …  torch our freedoms rather than
let the torch of freedom burn brightly”

  • what specific comments or legal/political action supports this viewpoint of yours?

You wrote ” they threaten to reinstate the horrors of yesterday by
aligning fascism with theocracy to bring out our worst impulses and destroy our
nation. ”

  • what ‘worst impulses’ are you talking about and who do these ‘worst impulses’ reside in?
  • also, what makes you think they want to align fascism with theocracy?
  • finally, what ‘horrors of yesterday’ are you referring to?

You wrote ” We have created a united front to defend
freedom, justice, reason and compassion consisting of those who seek to protect
our planet, reduce gun violence, champion abortion rights and equality for women
and people of diverse sexual orientations, promote education, help the poor, make
the wealthy pay their fair share, hold the powerful accountable for their actions
and to spread progressive ideals.”

  • in what way do you wish to ‘protect our planet’? What threats do you perceive and how do you plan to remedy them?
  • how do you plan to reduce gun violence?
  • what ‘progressive ideals’ do you wish to spread?

You wrote ” We support a spiritual transformation in the
religious world to support reason, science and our precious natural world rather
than thoughts and prayers to non-existent supernatural entities. ”

  • What issues do you have with thoughts and prayer and why is this relevant to your call to action?
  • What supernatural entities do you assert are non-existent?
  • Is it possible to prove a negative? E.g., Can you prove that Santa Claus does not exist? Or is it more accurate to say there is no evidence for the existence of Santa Claus?
  • I am supportive of interfaith networks. I am not fully aware of the supernatural entities of many religions, but at the same time I do not endorse any person/group that asserts that they do not exist.

You wrote “we are
joining forces to increase the effectiveness of us all in opposing the DeSantis
agenda in Florida, and to prevent him from spreading his toxic views beyond our
borders as President. ”

  • what exactly is ‘ the DeSantis
    agenda in Florida’ and what specific comments legal/political actions do you take issue with?
  • why are you labelling his views toxic without showing the damage they can/will cause?
  • what views are you talking about?

You wrote “If your cause requires allies, for instance to sign petitions to put abortion on the
ballot, or gun control measures, or to elect public servants who will truly serve the
public, join our coalition and support the causes of other progressives ”

  • What exactly is a progressive?
  • Can a progressive be in any political party, e.g. Democrat, Republican or Libertarian?

You wrote “PROTECT Democracy also provides inspirational music,
pro bono lawyers, public speakers, website assistance, fora to share your views and
allies to advance your cause.”

  • I think you mean ‘forum’ not ‘fora’ but I’m not sure.

You wrote “If you would like to join our ranks, just let us know and we will gladly add you and/or your organization to our list. If you know other groups or individuals who you think
would like to join us who share our values, please forward this on to them. No one
will be required to support all the causes of all the other groups, and each is free to
only support those causes they believe in. ”

  • I am unable to personally to generate any interest in this project because it does not seem to present arguments with evidence. I was linked to Rabbi Silver’s website but do not wish to comb through the material there. If he were to re-present his missive with footnotes, perhaps linking to parts of that website, then I would re-consider. Since Rabbi Silver is an attorney, he is quite capable of presenting a case with assertions backed by evidence. But he didn’t do so and as a result I cannot personally volunteer my alliance.
  • I think the anti-faith statement (“non-existent supernatural entities”)  creates conflict with the current alliance we have with interfaith groups. I dont feel comfortable  ignoring such a statement which directly flies in the face of the interfaith acceptance of religious viewpoints because religious viewpoints are based on unseen entities in many cases.
Regards,
Terrence Brannon

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The gangsters in the Ministry committee at Palm Beach Quakers: we do what we want and then tell you about it later. Quaker process be gone!

 The title is a bit sensationalistic but not much. In August 2023, in Lake Worth, FL business meeting was held at 1pm. During this meeting, it was suggested that the unprogrammed worship should begin with reading a quote from George Fox's writings. After this motion was raised, the clerk said: "those in favor, say aye" and then he said: "are there any objections"? At this point I stood up and said: "I object. First of all, why was this morning's worship at 10:30am opened with a quote from George Fox even though we have not agreed upon it in business meeting yet? Second of all, you already give them a welcome packet. The more you talk, the more you lead people into the mind instead of into the supramental silence beyond the mind. It is presumptuous and haughty of you to think you can take the role of educator to someone new to this meeting without them requesting it. They might be new to this meeting but that doesnt mean they are new to spirituality....
Read more

"Standing aside" does not imply consensus

Image
 The Quaker so-called consensus process is the complete opposite of sitting and waiting for God... at least in my experience of it. The egos are flying and the pressure to have your way is immense.  When a person stands aside, it is similar to getting out of the way of an oncoming 18-wheeler. You arent doing it because it is right, true or good... or most importantly because it is God's will. You are doing it because everyone else in the room wants things their way and you are tired of these people tearing into your subtle body with their resentment. And it isnt just the Lake Worth meeting where this happens. Note this: https://www.reddit.com/r/quakerism/comments/17y5bxa/i_can_give_examples_of_monthly_meetings_which/ And non-Quakers who take a rational objective evaluation of Quaker consensus critique it as follows: https://berkeleyjournal.org/2015/05/26/the-theology-of-consensus/   Quaker meetings have a huge uphill battle in reconciling the truth in silence (the spiritu...
Read more

Summary Report of My Outburst at the Lake Worth Quaker Business Meeting on Sept 10, 2023

I’ve had many revelations since this apparent “bad” event took place. The goal of this writing is not those revelations but to accurately report what occurred on that day. The Palm Beach Quaker meeting meets at 823 N A St, Lake Worth, FL USA. After morning worship and lunch, there was a decision to hold the business meeting even though some key people were absent. The first item of business was to ratify the minutes from the previous month. The Clerk (John Palozzi) said “do all agree to this summary report of last month’s minutes”?  It was at this point that I said:  “I am not in agreement with the statement that COVID rates are rising in Florida. Before I could agree with such a statement, I would need to confirm at least the following: the existence of the Corona Virus The infectiousness of the Corona Virus Evidence that there is a working test for the Corona Virus It was at this point that Atlanta Chuck said “Oh jesus” Then the Clerk said: “This is not the time or place to ...
Read more